Back to kit catalogue

Graildex Gunpla research

Kit catalogue & side-by-side comparison

Compare exact editions, browse verified review references and examine original pros and cons. Every note is specific to its kit; missing information stays marked as unverified.

38 curated kit references · 14 with editorial notes · no third-party images or review text copied

Find a kit

HG · 2019.05

HGCE Destiny Gundam

Review source available

MG · 2000.10

MG MS-07B Gouf

Review source available

MG · 2001.02

MG MS-07B-3 Gouf Custom

Review source available

HG · Release date unknown

HGUC MS-07B-3 Gouf Custom

Review source available

MG · Release date unknown

MG RX-178 Gundam Mk-II

Review source available

Showing 1–12 of 38 matches

Page 1/4

Compare two editions

Kit A

Gundam Sazabi Ver. Ka

MG · 1/100 · 2013.12

Edition identifier: m175

Review coverage: Graildex editorial notes available

Strengths

  • Large display presence with multi-layered armor and a full-open mechanical display mode.
  • Detailed inner structure and an extensive selection of accessories.

Trade-offs

  • Its size and weight demand substantial shelf space and careful support for action poses.
  • The hip joints may loosen after repeated repositioning, and heavier weapons can challenge the wrists.

Exact-edition sources

Dalong.net (English)

Comparison shows separately sourced notes, not laboratory measurements or a calculated winner.

Kit B

RG Gundam Sazabi

RG · 1/144 · 2018.08

Edition identifier: rg29

Review coverage: Graildex editorial notes available

Strengths

  • Complex layered armor, moveable panels and detailed funnel deployment at 1/144 scale.
  • Dedicated weapon-gripping hands help secure its accessories.

Trade-offs

  • Large size and complexity for an RG, with a higher cost and assembly commitment than simpler 1/144 kits.

Exact-edition sources

Dalong.net (English)

Comparison shows separately sourced notes, not laboratory measurements or a calculated winner.

More trustworthy sources

These are independent source directories, not claims that every kit has a matched review. Product photographs and review text remain with their publishers.

Community builders can help improve the catalogue

Submitting a firsthand observation is optional. User contributions remain pending manual review and are never published automatically.

Open a kit and suggest a correction or firsthand note